Independence has to be designed into the research.
These are working institutional policies for funding, conflicts, review and corrections. Formal legal governance structures are published only after they exist.
Research independence
Funding may define a research question or geographic scope, but it cannot prescribe a rating, conclusion, preferred technology or policy outcome.
Funding transparency
Material project support is disclosed with the output. Funding relationships that could reasonably affect interpretation are stated alongside the research.
Conflict of interest
Authors, researchers and reviewers disclose material financial, professional or institutional conflicts relevant to a release. Conflicted contributions are not represented as independent review.
Review & corrections
Working research remains challengeable. Material corrections receive a version change, dated note and explanation; prior versions remain identifiable where practical.
No invented board. No invented peer review.
The current working site identifies internal team responsibilities but does not claim a formal board, scientific council or completed peer review where those structures or reviews have not been established. Governance appointments and reviewer disclosures will be added as they become real.